If your problems that you have in your vehicle fleet discover 2014 Ford Kuga vs. 2014 Toyota RAV4 vs. 2014 Honda CR-V you could locate this relative test fairly potentially aid you make the right selection.
Toyota previously this year unveiled its fourth-generation RAV4, Honda has really likewise introduced the fourth generation of CRV and Ford has actually exposed the most recent version of the Kuga.
2014 Ford Kuga vs. 2014 Toyota RAV4 vs. 2014 Honda CR-V comparative test
2014 Ford Kuga
By utilizing its worldwide muscle to push frames, Ford has taken its opponents by shock and left them with some catching-up to do. The most economical Kuga is â 20,900– that’s â 605 much less than an entry-level Honda CR-V and a full â 1,695 less than the key Toyota RAV4.
For â 2,500 more than the price of a basic Kuga, you can get the four-wheel-drive TDCI diesel, which will happily pull a 2,000 kg horsebox or campers.
The Ford has a neater interior compared to the RAV4 and a lot better dealing with and journey. Plus it really feels much more outstanding compared to the instead dowdy CR-V. The second-generation Kuga is, on paper, the kind of vehicle that Ford does finest and should certainly have been creating long back.
For many years Ford’s sidetracked management can not obtain it together. Rather than making its very own vehicle to comply with the expanding requirement for SUVs in the 1990s, Ford first plugged the gap in its UK design array with a rebadged Nissan Terrano (made in Spain), then later a rebadged Mazda Memorial (made in Japan), offering them as the Radical.
It also got Land Rover, restored it and for a couple of years had access to the best 4x4s in the world. In a masterly example of company rashness, it offered business so Tata can take pleasure in healthy earnings from Ford-designed items.
The aged variation of the Kuga, presented in 2008, was a come in the right directions, nevertheless this one is better still. It’s being supplied as the Escape in America and there are obviously take advantage of economies of scale.
The one concern is the name. Why not Cougar? Due to the fact that Ford had in fact currently made use of the label on an unfortunate sporting activities coupÃ © that had a short shelf life from the late 1990s, it’s. It was marketed as a real owner’s vehicle, and Ford wished it would end up being as prominent as the Capri. It had not been and it didn’t.
In those days Ford had a hard time to take on trademark name such as BMW in layout and quality. This Kuga, nonetheless, does.
2014 Toyota Rav4
The most up to date RAV4 has a great deal to measure up to. The initial auto didn’t simply develop the soft-roader course when it was launched back in 1994, however also revealed that steering an useful automobile need not be dull.
The styling was strange, the performance respectable– it can sprint to 62mph in around 11 seconds, supplying it actual sporty qualifications– and it was enjoyable to drive. For folks seeking something uncommon, it was tough to defeat.
Twenty years ago the closest competitor was the Suzuki Vitara, a thin jeep lookalike that is still seen in convertible guise as a hire vehicle in Mediterranean coastline resorts. Today the opposition is a little bit much more intense.
Therefore is the fourth-generation RAV4. The brand-new automobile has several qualities, however the sense of enjoyable that characterised the original is not one of them.
All this conservativeness has an upside, nonetheless. The interior might be unexciting, however there is not a single rattle to be heard or lightweight joint to be seen. The driving position is comfortable– affording a decent raised view of the roadway without making you feel as though you are at the wheel of an HGV– and the back will hold an infant seat, a child seat and a booster seat at one time. The boot is on the little side, though– those of both the Kuga and CR-V are larger.
The RAV4 has been criticised for wallowing in corners, not feeling stylish enough under acceleration and, well, being a bit dull to drive. What it does not have in driveability, it makes up for in security and simplicity of use.
The engine array is similarly easy and includes a 149bhp 2-litre petrol unit with continually variable transmission and four-wheel drive; a 122bhp 2-litre diesel with front-wheel drive and a six-speed handbook gearbox; and a 148bhp 2.2-litre with four-wheel drive and a six-speed manual or six-speed automatic. For an automobile this size, the biggest engine is best.
It might not have the character or groundbreaking appeal of the initial, but the latest RAV4 is tough to fault if what you are after is a no-nonsense family car with off-road pretensions.
For busy households who don’t have time to fret about breaking down on the way to the in-laws’, there’s still little out there to beat it.
2014 Honda CR-V
The brand-new CR-V, the fourth generation of the British-built model, is quieter, smoother and more dynamic than its predecessor. It feels gargantuan when you’re trying to squeeze into a parking spot, however on the road it’s nippy enough to maneuver around a city. The raised seating and the vast windscreen offer the motorist a scenic view of the road.
Even in the midst of wailing sirens, grunting bikes and the ding-a-linging of bike bells the CR-V was a haven of calm. It was the quietest 4×4 I have been in and it shut out the sound around me without the should switch on the radio.
There suffices area in the boot to fit the Household Cavalry, consisting of steeds, with area to spare. In accurate measurements, with the back seats in place the boot capacity is 589 litres– 147 litres up from the previous model. Some smart Honda engineers have reduced the height and width of the automobile without compromising any interior space.
Catering for modern families may have been at the heart of Honda’s design, but the practical, wipe-clean finish– though wonderful for children– isn’t the most elegant. It has 3 cupholders, an useful bin in the center console and roomy side pockets.
Jeremy Clarkson doesn’t specifically like this vehicle (he granted it two stars last week) but he’s 6ft 5in, whereas I’m 5ft 4in, and the reality that the driver’s seat is lower and closer to the pedals than in numerous 4x4s is a benefit. A point scored for the ladies– well done, Honda.
An additional function created to make driving as simple as possible is a neat little rear- view camera– an extremely helpful piece of equipment for sneaking into tight parking areas, or for making sure you do not reverse over anyone on the school run. The CR-V that I drove did not have a sat nav, which for a car costing â�¤ 29,055 I would anticipate to be part of the plan.
Honda states the current CR-V releases 12 % less CO2 than the previous model, and the new figure of 154g/km puts the automobile one band lower than its predecessor. If that’s not green enough, there is always the 1.6-litre i-DTEC diesel. It is offered from autumn, and Honda flaunts that it has CO2 exhausts of simply 119g/km.
The CR-V may be a little dull inside and it won’t set the tarmac alight, however if you’re thinking about buying one, you most likely aren’t trying to find that. Reliable, solid and large it is; the same can’t be said for our roadways.